Clemson, SC, September 11, 2025
News Summary
Clemson University is facing backlash for dismantling its diversity commissions and removing DEI requirements from class syllabi. This decision follows pressure from the Trump administration and public outcry over controversial diversity initiatives. The move is intended to comply with executive orders aimed at eliminating DEI practices in education, with potential impacts on federal funding. The university’s actions have sparked heated debates on inclusivity and merit-based evaluations in academia.
Clemson University Faces Increased Scrutiny Over Diversity Policies Amid Trump Administration Pressure
Clemson, South Carolina – Clemson University has announced the dismantling of all its diversity commissions and the removal of a diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) requirement from a class syllabus following public outcry. These changes come on the heels of intensified scrutiny over the university’s DEI initiatives, particularly in light of pressure from the Trump administration.
The decision to disband diversity commissions was officially stated on September 3, 2025, as part of the university’s efforts to comply with executive orders aimed at eliminating DEI initiatives in educational institutions. The academic semester began on August 26, and the university is moving swiftly to re-evaluate its policies to avoid jeopardizing federal funding.
Compounding the situation, a chemical and biomolecular engineering class syllabus surfaced online, revealing a DEI certificate assignment that constituted 15% of the students’ grades. This information went viral after being shared by the right-wing social media account “Libs of TikTok,” which boasts 4.3 million followers. Following the backlash, Clemson spokesperson Joe Galbraith stated that the syllabus contained “incorrect information” and will be corrected, with students being notified about the changes.
In response to criticism from South Carolina Republican politicians, including gubernatorial candidate Nancy Mace, Clemson has faced considerable pressure regarding its DEI policies. Mace, along with other politicians, cited previous instances such as a healthcare form issued by the university which included multiple gender identity options, as reason for their discontent with Clemson’s approach to inclusivity.
The decision to remove the DEI requirement is part of a broader trend among universities, including Clemson, aiming to align with the Trump administration’s directives. These executive orders assert that institutions of higher education should prioritize evaluations based on merit rather than race. Failure to comply could result in loss of federal funding, particularly under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits racial discrimination in federally funded programs.
The ongoing scrutiny stems from a Department of Education investigation into Clemson’s involvement with The Ph.D. Project, an initiative designed to increase the number of underrepresented minorities in academic roles. Clemson is one of 45 universities under inquiry for potentially engaging in race-exclusionary practices. This investigation was initiated following a letter from the Department of Education on February 14, highlighting potential civil rights violations related to race-based initiatives.
The Ph.D. Project’s stated goal is to expand the talent pool by increasing diversity among business school faculty. Despite its intentions, the collaboration between Clemson and The Ph.D. Project has come under fire as the debate over the appropriateness and impact of DEI initiatives within educational institutions intensifies across the nation.
As the academic community reflects upon these developments, Clemson University finds itself at a crossroads amidst criticisms of its past policies and the evolving landscape of higher education policies surrounding diversity.
FAQ
What recent actions has Clemson University taken regarding diversity initiatives?
Clemson University announced it will disband all diversity commissions and removed a DEI requirement from class syllabi following public backlash and pressure from the Trump administration.
What prompted the review of Clemson’s diversity policies?
The university’s policies came under scrutiny following a Department of Education investigation into its involvement with The Ph.D. Project and allegations of race-exclusionary practices.
What consequences could Clemson face regarding its diversity initiatives?
Clemson could risk losing federal funding if found in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, and national origin.
Key Features of the Situation at Clemson University
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Action Taken | Disbanding all diversity commissions and removing DEI requirements from syllabi. |
| Reason for Action | Pressure from the Trump administration and public backlash. |
| Investigating Body | Department of Education |
| Program Under Scrutiny | The Ph.D. Project aimed at increasing diversity in academic roles. |
| Potential Consequences | Risk of losing federal funding due to non-compliance with civil rights laws. |
Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic
HERE Resources
High School Football Announcer Dismissed for Racist Remarks
School Board Removes DEI Language from Policy
South Carolina Moves to Ban DEI Initiatives with Costly Implications
Additional Resources
- Post and Courier: Clemson Science Class Syllabus Controversy
- SC Daily Gazette: Clemson Named in Federal DEI Investigation
- The Tiger: Clemson University DEI Investigation
- Wikipedia: Diversity in Higher Education
- Encyclopedia Britannica: Diversity in Education
Author: STAFF HERE GREENVILLE
The HERE Greenville Staff Writers are a collaborative team of journalists, editors, and local contributors passionate about delivering accurate, timely information to the Greenville community. As part of the HEREcity.com Network, which powers over 100 U.S. city sites including HEREcolumbia.com, our staff draws on collective experience in South Carolina journalism to cover everything from business sales and real estate developments to dining deals and community initiatives. Our Expertise and Background Local Roots in Greenville Our team includes lifelong Greenville residents and SC natives with deep knowledge of the area’s history, economy, and culture. We’ve covered key events like the recent sales in the Heritage Historic District 17 , Greenville’s textile and railroad heritage 2 , and growth in local education sectors (e.g., Greenville Technical College programs) 27 . Collective Experience With over 50 combined years in journalism, our staff has backgrounds in print, digital media, and community reporting. We prioritize fact-based stories, drawing from sources like the Greenville Chamber of Commerce, city government records, and on-the-ground interviews. Commitment to Quality Every article is a group effort, involving research, editing, and verification to ensure reliability. We adhere to journalistic standards, citing credible sources and updating content as new details emerge.
