News Summary
Governor Henry McMaster has announced plans to impose limits on purchases made with SNAP benefits in South Carolina. The initiative, aimed at promoting public health, proposes restrictions on the types of foods eligible for purchase. This follows a previous legislative attempt to limit junk food purchases with SNAP. While some support the measure for health reasons, critics argue it could negatively impact low-income families’ ability to buy desired items. The decision requires USDA approval and could influence future food assistance policies across the nation.
South Carolina – Governor Henry McMaster has announced plans to limit purchases made with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, commonly known as food stamps. The proposed executive order, which McMaster shared on social media, aims to impose “common-sense limits” on the types of foods that can be bought with these benefits in an effort to improve public health in the state.
Currently, over 580,000 people in South Carolina rely on SNAP benefits, and these proposed restrictions may significantly impact their purchasing choices. The Governor’s announcement follows a previous attempt to legislate similar restrictions through the introduction of the South Carolina SNAP Nutrition Integrity Act in February 2025. This bill sought to prohibit the purchase of candy and soda with SNAP benefits but did not progress out of committee by the end of the legislative session in May.
Governor McMaster indicated that he views the initiative as part of a larger trend towards improving health across America, stating that “America is getting healthy, and South Carolina will do her part.” The proposed changes would require approval from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), as the agency will need to grant a waiver for the restrictions to be implemented. Any changes are expected to take effect early next year.
Currently, twelve states, including Idaho, Nebraska, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Wisconsin, and Wyoming, have received approval to place restrictions on SNAP purchases using the USDA’s SNAP Food Restriction Waivers. These states have initiated efforts to curb the purchase of what are deemed “non-nutritious” foods using food assistance benefits.
Public Reaction and Health Considerations
As the news of McMaster’s proposed restrictions unfolds, public reactions remain mixed. Some segments of the population are in favor of the measure, citing public health concerns and the need to promote healthier eating habits among low-income families. They argue that limiting the purchase of junk food could lead to improved health outcomes in communities impacted by high rates of obesity and diet-related diseases.
Conversely, critics of the initiative emphasize the importance of allowing families to enjoy occasional treats, especially for children who may otherwise miss out on experiences that contribute to a well-rounded childhood. This perspective highlights the potential burden that such restrictions could place on low-income families, making it harder for them to afford desired food items, even in moderation.
Background Context
The initiative comes in the wake of similar restrictions implemented in other states during the Trump administration, which encouraged states to take action against purchasing items considered to be unhealthy or lacking nutritional value, such as sodas and candy. Furthermore, the ongoing health crisis exacerbated by the pandemic has amplified discussions surrounding nutrition and food security across the nation.
As it stands, the proposed limitations on SNAP purchases in South Carolina could set a precedent for future legislation, potentially inspiring further action in other states as they grapple with issues of public health, nutrition, and food assistance programs. The development of this executive order and its potential impact on families in South Carolina underscores the ongoing debate surrounding food policy and public health initiatives.
Moving forward, stakeholders, including state officials, advocates, and community organizations, will likely engage in discussions to weigh the benefits of such restrictions against the needs and rights of families reliant on SNAP benefits. The outcome of this initiative will be closely monitored as it unfolds in the coming months.
Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic
Author: STAFF HERE GREENVILLE
The HERE Greenville Staff Writers are a collaborative team of journalists, editors, and local contributors passionate about delivering accurate, timely information to the Greenville community. As part of the HEREcity.com Network, which powers over 100 U.S. city sites including HEREcolumbia.com, our staff draws on collective experience in South Carolina journalism to cover everything from business sales and real estate developments to dining deals and community initiatives. Our Expertise and Background Local Roots in Greenville Our team includes lifelong Greenville residents and SC natives with deep knowledge of the area’s history, economy, and culture. We’ve covered key events like the recent sales in the Heritage Historic District 17 , Greenville’s textile and railroad heritage 2 , and growth in local education sectors (e.g., Greenville Technical College programs) 27 . Collective Experience With over 50 combined years in journalism, our staff has backgrounds in print, digital media, and community reporting. We prioritize fact-based stories, drawing from sources like the Greenville Chamber of Commerce, city government records, and on-the-ground interviews. Commitment to Quality Every article is a group effort, involving research, editing, and verification to ensure reliability. We adhere to journalistic standards, citing credible sources and updating content as new details emerge.
